Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) primary screening is an effective approach to assessing cervical cancer risk. Self-collected vaginal swabs can expand testing access, but the data defining analytical performance criteria necessary for adoption of self-collected specimens are limited, especially for those occurring outside the clinic, where the swab remains dry during transport. Here, we evaluated the performance of self-collected vaginal swabs for HPV detection using the Cobas 6800. There was insignificant variability between swabs self-collected by the same individual (n = 15 participants collecting 5 swabs per participant), measured by amplification of HPV and human β-globin control DNA. Comparison of self-collected vaginal swab and provider-collected cervical samples (n = 144 pairs) proved highly concordant for HPV detection (total agreement = 90.3%; positive percentage agreement = 84.2%). There was no relationship between the number of dry storage days and amplification of HPV (n = 68; range, 4 to 41 days). Exposure of self-collected dry swabs to extreme summer and winter temperatures did not affect testing outcomes. A second internal control (RNase P) demonstrated that lack of amplification for β-globin from self-collected specimens was consistent with poor, but not absent, cellularity. These data suggest that self-collected vaginal samples enable accurate clinical HPV testing, and that extended ambient dry storage or exposure to extreme temperatures does not influence HPV detection. Furthermore, lack of β-globin amplification in HPV-negative samples accurately identified participants who required recollection.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michelle Qi
Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Anissa R. Naranjo
Hewlett-Packard (United States)
Abigail J. Duque
Kaiser Permanente
Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
University of Washington
National Cancer Institute
Kaiser Permanente
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Qi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e73cb8b6db6435876b6258 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.02.006