INTRODUCTION: Assessment of function in patients with degenerative thoracolumbar disorders (DTD) has traditionally relied solely on the patient’s subjective perception of disability. There is a clear need to better understand an objective measure of physical activity impairment in this patient cohort. METHODS: This analysis is part of the Stanford SpineTrak study, a RCT to assess the feasibility of using a commercially available smartwatch (AppleWatch) to monitor outcome in patients with DTD. Mean preoperative physical activity 2 weeks before surgery was expressed as raw step count, as well as in standardized z-scores that wre referenced to age- and sex-specific values of a control population from a large public database. Step counts were assessed for convergent validity with established patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and impairment in activity was stratified into performance groups based on z-score cut-off values. RESULTS: Of 67 patients with DTD, 65 patients (62% female) with a mean age (SD) of 63.8 (12.8) years were available for analysis with a mean (SD) daily step count of 5215 (3868). Physical activity showed significant correlation with the ODI (r = 0.28, 95% CI -0.49-0.03), SF36-PCS (r = -0.34, 95% CI 0.11-0.54) and PROMIS-PF (r = -0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.65). No, Mild, moderate, and severe impairment in activity performance were defined as corresponding z-scores of >0, 0 to -0.99, -1 to -1.99 and = -2, accounting for 20%, 29%, 43% and 8% of the study population. Each 1-step increase in activity impairment resulted in increased subjective disability as measured by the ODI, SF36-PCS and PROMIS-PF (all < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes a new wearable-based objective measure of real-life physical activity as well as corresponding standard scores that allow for a direct comparison of test results between individual patients and different study populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maldaner et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: