March 15, 2024NeurosurgeryOpen Access

107 Conventional Catheter-based Angiography Versus Non-invasive Imaging in the Evaluation of Symptomatic Carotid Disease

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

AKAlex KeisterColumbus State Community College JKJane KhalifeCooper University Hospital JWJoshua WeinbergThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Retrospective analysis shows catheter angiography reclassifies carotid stenosis in symptomatic patients, highlighting the value of invasive imaging before intervention.

Key Points

Catheter angiography reclassified 19% of symptomatic carotid stenosis referrals to medical management, preventing unnecessary invasive interventions.
Among 50 patients with suspected occlusion, catheter imaging revealed a string sign in 32%, allowing successful revascularization with carotid stenting.
Retrospective analysis across two centers demonstrates that digital subtraction angiography refines non-invasive imaging to guide appropriate revascularization.

Cite This Study

Keister et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e73de0b6db6435876b7a01 https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002809_107

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Retrospective analysis shows catheter angiography reclassifies carotid stenosis in symptomatic patients, highlighting the value of invasive imaging before intervention.

107 Conventional Catheter-based Angiography Versus Non-invasive Imaging in the Evaluation of Symptomatic Carotid Disease

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

107 Conventional Catheter-based Angiography Versus Non-invasive Imaging in the Evaluation of Symptomatic Carotid Disease

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider