Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: Dens fractures are an increasingly common cervical fractures, yet their epidemiology and its implications remain under-examined. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all traumatic dens fracture patients managed at our institution over a ten year period with respect to demographic, clinical, and outcomes data. Patient subsets were compared across these parameters. RESULTS: 303 traumatic dens fracture patients were identified, who showed a bimodal age distribution with strong goodness of fit centered at age 22.3 ± 5.7 (R = 0.8781) and at 77.7 ± 13.9 (R = 0.9686). A population pyramid demonstrated a bimodal distribution among male patients, but not among female patients, which was confirmed with a strong goodness of fit for two distinct male patient subpopulations age <35 (R = 0.9791) and age =35 (R = 0.8843), but a weak fit for a second female subpopulation age <35 (24.5 ± 14.2, R = 0.5957). Patients age <35 were more likely to be male (82.4% vs. 46.9%, OR = 5.29 [1.54, 17.57], p = 0.0052). Moreover, patients age <35 were more likely to have MVC as their mechanism of injury (64.7% vs. 14.1%, OR = 11.18 [3.77, 31.77], p < 0.0001), were more likely to have a severe trauma injury severity score (17.6% vs. 2.9%, OR = 7.23 [1.88, 28.88], p = 0.0198). There was no difference with respect to underlying fracture morphology, likelihood of undergoing surgery, having concomitant atlas or subaxial fractures, or Nurick scores at presentation. Patients age <35 were less likely to have fracture nonunion at follow (18.2% vs. 53.7%, OR = 0.19 [0.041, 0.76], p = 0.0288). CONCLUSIONS: The dens fracture patient population comprises two subpopulations, distinguished by differences in age, sex, and injury mechanism and severity, with male dens fracture patients demonstrating a bimodal age distribution. While young patients were more likely to high-energy injury mechanisms leading severe trauma, they were less likely to have fracture nonunion at follow up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cloney et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: