In this paper we study the following nonlinear fractional Hartree (or Choquard-Pekar) equation <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>s</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>μ</m:mi> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>I</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>α</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mo>*</m:mo> <m:mi>F</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>u</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>F</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo>′</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>u</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mtext> </m:mtext> <m:mtext>in</m:mtext> <m:mspace width="0.3333em" /> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>N</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:mo>,</m:mo> </m:math> (-Δ)ˢu+μ u=(IαF(u))F(u) in RN, (*) where μ > 0, s ∈ (0, 1), N ≥ 2, α ∈ (0, N ), <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>I</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>α</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mo>∼</m:mo> <m:mfrac> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">|</m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">|</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>N</m:mi> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mi>α</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:mrow> </m:mfrac> </m:math> Iα~ 1 x N-α is the Riesz potential, and F is a general subcritical nonlinearity. The goal is to prove existence of multiple (radially symmetric) solutions <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo>∈</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>H</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>s</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>N</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:math> u∈ Hˢ(RN) , by assuming F odd or even: we consider both the case μ > 0 fixed and the case <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mo>∫</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>N</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>u</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mi>m</m:mi> <m:mo>></m:mo> <m:mn>0</m:mn> </m:math> ∫ _RNu²=m >0 prescribed. Here we also simplify some arguments developed for s = 1 (S. Cingolani, M. Gallo, and K. Tanaka, “Multiple solutions for the nonlinear Choquard equation with even or odd nonlinearities,” Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. , vol. 61, no. 68, p. 34, 2022). A key point in the proof is given by the research of suitable multidimensional odd paths, which was done in the local case by Berestycki and Lions (H. Berestycki and P.-L. Lions, “Nonlinear scalar field equations II: existence of infinitely many solutions,” Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 347–375, 1983); for (*) the nonlocalities play indeed a special role. In particular, some properties of these paths are needed in the asymptotic study (as μ varies) of the mountain pass values of the unconstrained problem, then exploited to describe the geometry of the constrained problem and detect infinitely many normalized solutions for any m > 0. The found solutions satisfy in addition a Pohozaev identity: in this paper we further investigate the validity of this identity for solutions of doubly nonlocal equations under a C 1 -regularity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cingolani et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: