We make a study of the <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</a:mi><a:mi>c</a:mi></a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>3120</a:mn><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo></a:math>, one of the five <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:msub><f:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</f:mi><f:mi>c</f:mi></f:msub></f:math> states observed by the LHCb Collaboration, which is well reproduced as a molecular state from the <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:msubsup><i:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</i:mi><i:mi>c</i:mi><i:mo>*</i:mo></i:msubsup><i:mover accent="true"><i:mi>K</i:mi><i:mo stretchy="false">¯</i:mo></i:mover></i:math> and <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><n:msubsup><n:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</n:mi><n:mi>c</n:mi><n:mo>*</n:mo></n:msubsup><n:mi>η</n:mi></n:math> channels mostly. The state with <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:msup><q:mi>J</q:mi><q:mi>P</q:mi></q:msup><q:mo>=</q:mo><q:mn>3</q:mn><q:mo>/</q:mo><q:msup><q:mn>2</q:mn><q:mo>−</q:mo></q:msup></q:math> decays to <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:msub><s:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</s:mi><s:mi>c</s:mi></s:msub><s:mover accent="true"><s:mi>K</s:mi><s:mo stretchy="false">¯</s:mo></s:mover></s:math> in the <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><x:mi>D</x:mi></x:math> wave, and we include this decay channel in our approach, as well as the effect of the <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><z:msubsup><z:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</z:mi><z:mi>c</z:mi><z:mo>*</z:mo></z:msubsup></z:math> width. With all these ingredients, we determine the fraction of the <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:msub><cb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</cb:mi><cb:mi>c</cb:mi></cb:msub><cb:mo stretchy="false">(</cb:mo><cb:mn>3120</cb:mn><cb:mo stretchy="false">)</cb:mo></cb:math> width that goes into <hb:math xmlns:hb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><hb:msub><hb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</hb:mi><hb:mi>c</hb:mi></hb:msub><hb:mi>π</hb:mi><hb:mover accent="true"><hb:mi>K</hb:mi><hb:mo stretchy="false">¯</hb:mo></hb:mover></hb:math>, which could be a measure of the <mb:math xmlns:mb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mb:msubsup><mb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</mb:mi><mb:mi>c</mb:mi><mb:mo>*</mb:mo></mb:msubsup><mb:mover accent="true"><mb:mi>K</mb:mi><mb:mo stretchy="false">¯</mb:mo></mb:mover></mb:math> molecular component, but due to a relatively big binding, compared to its analogous <rb:math xmlns:rb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><rb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</rb:mi><rb:mo stretchy="false">(</rb:mo><rb:mn>2012</rb:mn><rb:mo stretchy="false">)</rb:mo></rb:math> state, we find only a small fraction of about 3%, which makes this measurement difficult with present statistics. As an alternative, we evaluate the scattering length and effective range of the <wb:math xmlns:wb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><wb:msubsup><wb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</wb:mi><wb:mi>c</wb:mi><wb:mo>*</wb:mo></wb:msubsup><wb:mover accent="true"><wb:mi>K</wb:mi><wb:mo stretchy="false">¯</wb:mo></wb:mover></wb:math> and <bc:math xmlns:bc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><bc:msubsup><bc:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</bc:mi><bc:mi>c</bc:mi><bc:mo>*</bc:mo></bc:msubsup><bc:mi>η</bc:mi></bc:math> channels, which, together with the binding and width of the <ec:math xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ec:msub><ec:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</ec:mi><ec:mi>c</ec:mi></ec:msub><ec:mo stretchy="false">(</ec:mo><ec:mn>3120</ec:mn><ec:mo stretchy="false">)</ec:mo></ec:math> state, could give us an answer to the issue of the compositeness of this state when these magnitudes are determined experimentally, something feasible nowadays, for instance, measuring correlation functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikeno et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: