In this paper, Zr:Dy:LiNbO 3 crystals are prepared by traditional pull‐up method, in which Zr 4+ doping concentrations are 0, 1, 2, and 4 mol%, respectively. In this paper, the defective structure of Zr:Dy:LiNbO 3 crystals and their resistance to photodamage under different Zr 4+ concentration doping are studied. Firstly, the influence of Zr 4+ doping concentration on the defective structure of Zr:Dy:LiNbO 3 crystal and the occupancy of doped ions under different Zr 4+ concentrations are tested and discussed by infrared (IR) absorption spectroscopy and ultraviolet‐visible near‐infrared (UV–vis–NIR) absorption spectroscopy. The Judd–Ofelt theoretical analysis results show that when the concentration of doped Zr 4+ is 2 mol%, the spectral quality factor (X) of Dy 3+ in lithium niobate crystals is significantly improved compared with that of Dy 3+ in other crystals. Secondly, resistance to photodamage of Zr:Dy:LiNbO 3 crystals is studied and analyzed by the light scattering exposure energy flow threshold method. The results show that when the concentration of doped Zr 4+ ions reaches 4 mol%, the exposure energy value is increased by 210 times compared with the no doping, which greatly improves the anti‐photodamage performance of the crystal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: