Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) approaches such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are rapidly emerging as effective and well-tolerated treatments for depression. With the most recent head-to-head studies demonstrating equivalence in clinical efficacy between rTMS, tDCS and widely used pharmaceutical antidepressants, there is urgent need for a paradigm shift towards its inclusion as a low-cost, low-risk frontline treatment for depression. Here, we provide a narrative review outlining barriers currently impeding translation of NIBS approaches into large-scale clinical use, with a view to developing a neural biomarker that could provide early stratification of patients as potential responders or non-responders. We describe how the TMS-evoked potential provides a marker of cortical excitability that could be used as a baseline predictor of whether the NIBS user will derive benefit from approaches tailored to achieve neuromodulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McNickle et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: