Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 4, 2024Open Access

The Contradiction of Populism and Judicial Independence (Unraveling Alexander Bickel’s Counter-Majoritarian Dilemma in the Context of the Indonesian Constitutional Court)

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MMMohamad Hidayat Muhtar

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e75dc3b6db6435876d44b2https://doi.org/10.32388/tzhml8
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Prophetic Law Perspective on Judicial Independence of the Indonesian Constitutional Court: Looking Back on 20 Years2024
  2. 2Between the People and the Populists: Safeguarding Judicial Independence in a Changing World2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Political Dynamics in the Selection of Judges of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Integrity and Independence2024
  4. 4Judicial Activism vs. Electoral Justice: The Overlooked Purcell Principle in Indonesia2025
  5. 5Strengthening Independence: Constitutional Interests As A Paradigm For Judicial Review In Indonesia2024