This paper meticulously delves into the intricate ethical implications that arise from the integration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) into the realm of Chinese psychological practice. The surge in interest in holistic well-being has spurred the incorporation of CAM modalities within psychology. This convergence lays bare a tapestry of intricate ethical quandaries. With a meticulous and rigorous examination, this study navigates the core ethical principles, including the imperative commitments to public welfare, shielding against potential harm, and upholding individual autonomy. The exploration unearths multifaceted challenges spanning transparency, the intricacies of accountability, the nuances of informed consent, and the shadows of potential exploitation. In response to these complexities, the paper advocates for strategic measures such as fostering interprofessional collaboration, catalyzing governmental initiatives, and embracing qualitative methodologies. Inescapably, the study underscores the pressing need for a responsible and reasonable integration that ensures the delivery of comprehensive and patient-centered care while aligning with China's constantly evolving mental health landscape. By engaging rigorously with these ethical dimensions, the integration of CAM emerges as a pivotal contributor to an inclusive and all-encompassing mental health framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ching Yin Wong (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: