The purpose of this study is to provide the guidelines on securing the Continuity of Operation in case of large-scale epidemics, by analyzing measures on disaster responses. At first, we divided whole period into three phases, which are the early, the middle and the end of phase, through finding the turning points on the COVID-19’s spreads, and classified their major response measures. And then, we reclassified the essential roles and the responsibilities in Korea disaster management system, with comparing the SPRP. As results, the essential measures on epidemic responses of Korea disaster management system, were classified into the operation of disaster management headquaters, the management of the isolated, the supports to local governments and the publics for living stability subsidy and the vaccinations. The major roles were classified as follows; the disaster managements(A), the management of the isolated(B,C/B,C,D,I), the supports to the local governments and the publics(F,H/C,F,H), and the Vaccinations(I,J). The result of this study could be expected to be used for establishing the guidelines of MOIS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: