We investigate the pair production of right-handed neutrinos mediated by a <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msup><a:mi>Z</a:mi><a:mo>′</a:mo></a:msup></a:math> mainly from the meson decays at the FASER detector of the HL-LHC. The <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msup><c:mi>Z</c:mi><c:mo>′</c:mo></c:msup></c:math> can be the additional gauge boson in either the <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>U</e:mi><e:mo stretchy="false">(</e:mo><e:mn>1</e:mn><e:msub><e:mo stretchy="false">)</e:mo><e:mrow><e:mi>B</e:mi><e:mo>−</e:mo><e:mi>L</e:mi></e:mrow></e:msub></e:math> or sterile <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi>ν</i:mi></i:math>-specific <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mi>U</k:mi><k:mo stretchy="false">(</k:mo><k:mn>1</k:mn><k:msub><k:mo stretchy="false">)</k:mo><k:mi>s</k:mi></k:msub></k:math> model. Taking the gauge coupling or the kinetic mixing at the current limits, we analyze the sensitivity to the masses of the heavy neutrinos, <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:msub><o:mi>M</o:mi><o:mi>N</o:mi></o:msub></o:math>, and active-sterile mixing, <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mo stretchy="false">|</q:mo><q:msub><q:mi>V</q:mi><q:mrow><q:mi>l</q:mi><q:mi>N</q:mi></q:mrow></q:msub><q:msup><q:mo stretchy="false">|</q:mo><q:mn>2</q:mn></q:msup></q:math>, of FASER2. In a background-free scenario, for the <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mi>U</u:mi><u:mo stretchy="false">(</u:mo><u:mn>1</u:mn><u:msub><u:mo stretchy="false">)</u:mo><u:mrow><u:mi>B</u:mi><u:mo>−</u:mo><u:mi>L</u:mi></u:mrow></u:msub></u:math> case, FASER2 is able to probe <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:mo stretchy="false">|</y:mo><y:msub><y:mi>V</y:mi><y:mrow><y:mi>l</y:mi><y:mi>N</y:mi></y:mrow></y:msub><y:msup><y:mo stretchy="false">|</y:mo><y:mn>2</y:mn></y:msup><y:mo>≈</y:mo><y:msup><y:mn>10</y:mn><y:mrow><y:mo>−</y:mo><y:mn>8</y:mn></y:mrow></y:msup></y:math> when <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:msub><cb:mi>M</cb:mi><cb:mi>N</cb:mi></cb:msub><cb:mo>∼</cb:mo><cb:mn>0.3</cb:mn><cb:mtext> </cb:mtext><cb:mtext> </cb:mtext><cb:mi>GeV</cb:mi></cb:math>, which is comparable to the current limits from the beam dump experiments. When comes to the <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><eb:mi>U</eb:mi><eb:mo stretchy="false">(</eb:mo><eb:mn>1</eb:mn><eb:msub><eb:mo stretchy="false">)</eb:mo><eb:mi>s</eb:mi></eb:msub></eb:math> model, FASER2 can probe <ib:math xmlns:ib="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ib:mo stretchy="false">|</ib:mo><ib:msub><ib:mi>V</ib:mi><ib:mrow><ib:mi>l</ib:mi><ib:mi>N</ib:mi></ib:mrow></ib:msub><ib:msup><ib:mo stretchy="false">|</ib:mo><ib:mn>2</ib:mn></ib:msup><ib:mo>≈</ib:mo><ib:msup><ib:mn>10</ib:mn><ib:mrow><ib:mo>−</ib:mo><ib:mn>10</ib:mn></ib:mrow></ib:msup></ib:math>, which is better than the current limits for at least one magnitude, in all three flavors. A proposed long-lived particle detector, FACET, is also studied, but no significant difference from FASER2 is derived.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: