How Different Is United Africa (UA) At The United Nations (UN) From African Union (AU) Within Africa? A Paradigmatics Research

Why do Paradigmatics come into vogue like Pragmatics?Why do Paradigmatics become trendy just like Pragmatics?To illustrate, the African context becomes a timely and lively menu to pick and choose from a variety of existing applied research environs.This Paper just does so.In doing so, however, it tried to rope in those facts only which makes complete sense unlike dangerous half-truths or half-knowledge.The term "United Africa (UA) " at the United Nations (UN) is not typically used in official contexts.However, there are two interpretations on UA.There is not a formal entity called UA within the UN or within Africa.In essence, the African Union (AU) and the African Group (AG) are two complementary entities working at different levels to achieve similar objectives.One operates within Africa, while the other operates within the UN system, representing African critical interests on the global scale.The UA is currently a hypothetical concept.The AU and the AG have become UN symbols for African cooperation serving different purposes and distinct spheres geo-relevance.The AU is a real entity with concrete activities marginalizing the UA conception to a level of occasional aspirational vision barring shrinkage of the whole of existing Continent into a survivor-mole-nation.The UA is not a symptom of fools rushing in where angels fear to tread!This Paper brings out the totality of applicable facts, irrevocable certainties, damned uncertainties, prevailing concepts, key differences, sensitive similarities, hypothetical scenarios and presumptive African emotions which are taking forward Africans as the originators, organizers and superiors in human race in the eyes of the World.In unique words, United Africa is a testament to the courage and vision of those who dare to venture where others hesitate.