Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To determine if ultrasound Doppler velocities within transjugular portosystemic shunts/direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS/DIPS) differ based on the stent diameter (8 mm vs. 10 mm) and report typical flow velocities at defined locations along the stent in patients with a patent TIPS/DIPS on venography. This study retrospectively analyzed a cohort of TIPS/DIPS recipients at a large tertiary care hospital from 2017 to 2022 (Table 282.1). Sixty-nine patient-entries with patent TIPS/DIPS venograms and available intervening Doppler US were identified (8 mm n=41; men: 70.7%, mean age: 57.5 years [range: 36-75 years]; 10-mm n=28; men: 50%, mean age: 50.2 years [range: 24-74 years]). The mean Doppler velocities were significantly different at the mid-stent (184.7 cm/s in 8-mm stents and 148.9 cm/s in 10-mm stents; p = 0.03, 95% CI 4.1-67.5) and hepatic-venous-end of the TIPS/DIPS (172.4 cm/s in 8-mm stents and 141.3 cm/s in 10-mm stents; p = 0.02, 95% CI 5.2-57.0). The mean Doppler velocities were not significantly different at the main-portal-vein-end (46.8 cm/s in 8 mm stents and 53.0 cm/s in 10-mm stents; p = 0.29, 95% CI -5.4-17.9). Peak velocities occurred at the mid-TIPS location for the majority of patent 8 mm TIPS (n=22) and at the portal-end of TIPS for the majority of 10-mm TIPS (n=12). Normal Doppler velocities within TIPS/DIPS differ depending on the shunt diameter. These findings demonstrate a need for specific Doppler screening thresholds in assessing TIPS/DIPS stents of differing calibers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitchell et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: