This research investigates real-time fault detection and classification in smart grids using five machine learning algorithms: Support Vector Machines (SVMs), k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN' Decision Trees, Random Forest and Gradient Boosting. Extensive experiments were conducted to compare them performance-wise in terms of accuracy, computational efficiency and robustness. The findings showed that Gradient Boosting attained the highest accuracy of 95.2%, which surpassed other algorithms. Second, the RF was illustrated with competitive accuracy (94.6%) less overfitting providing a reliable option for use. Interpretable Decision Trees were challenged by issues surrounding overfitting. 92.5% accuracy was found in the case of SVMs; however, these turned out to be computationally complex procedures as well. K-NN reported competitive accuracy (89.3%), but was computationally expensive. Comparison to related works from all fields underscored the cross-domain relevance of fault detection in critical systems. The study provides useful observations on the choice of fault detection algorithms to be used in smart grids, which recommend a compromise based on accuracy performance and computational efficiency while also being adapted for specific grid features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: