This is a study of moral disengagement in the political discourse of the 2015 state takeover of Little Rock School District. The purpose of this study was to propose and describe a framework through which institutionalized racism could be understood as the effect of individuals' actions justified through policy discourse. Moral disengagement is a social psychological framework that focuses on the role of individual agency in maintaining a system of social values in contradiction with the societal circumstances those values bring about. In a critical discourse analysis of the policy rhetoric of white elite policy actors, we identified broad use of every mechanism of moral disengagement. White policy actors sought self-exoneration for racially stratifying outcomes through various means of rationalization of the takeover. Implications for educational leaders and researchers are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clement et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: