In an energy harvesting (EH) system for the internet of things (IoT), the input voltage V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">IN</inf> may vary within a wide range, e.g., from 0.3 to 1.8V from a solar cell, while the battery voltage V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">BAT</inf> and output voltage V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">OUT</inf> are usually higher than V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">IN</inf> . Figure 31.6.1 shows a dual-mode DC-DC converter for EH interface: Single-Input-Dual-Output (SIDO) and Dual-Input-Single-Output (DISO). In SIDO, the converter delivers power from source to both load and battery as POUT< PIN. Once POUT> PIN, the converter is in DISO mode, delivering both source and battery power to the load. A switched-capacitor (SC) converter is favorable for low-power EH interfaces. Previous works have used two-stage schemes [1, 2], i.e., not converting P <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">IN</inf> directly to P <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">OUT</inf> or P <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">BAT</inf> . This could isolate inputs or outputs, however, is not area efficient. In [3] and [4] a series multiplexer MUX for channel selection is employed, but the loss from MUX is considerable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: