Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a global health concern with significant morbidity and mortality. Effective management of type 2 DM necessitates accurate monitoring of fasting blood glucose levels. Traditional laboratory methods, while accurate, are not always convenient for patients, leading to a growing interest in reliable point-of-care testing. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of fasting blood glucose measurements between point-of-care testing using a glucometer and traditional laboratory methods (hexokinase and end-point) to determine the feasibility of home-based patient monitoring. Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study included 150 type 2 DM patients from Farooq Hospital Westwood, Lahore. Participants underwent fasting blood glucose testing using three methods: the hexokinase method, the end-point method, and a glucometer (Accu-check instant S Meter). The Pearson correlation was employed to assess the linear relationship between the methods, while multivariate ANOVA was used to compare the means. Results: The Pearson correlation coefficients indicated a strong positive correlation between the glucometer readings and both laboratory methods, with coefficients of 0.994 for hexokinase and 0.997 for the end-point method. The average fasting blood glucose levels measured were 128.43 mg/dL (±61.257) for hexokinase, 128.59 mg/dL (±61.110) for the end-point method, and slightly lower at 123.59 mg/dL (±58.920) for the glucometer. Conclusion: The study concluded that glucometer readings are highly correlated with traditional laboratory methods, indicating that point-of-care testing can be a reliable alternative for patients to monitor fasting blood glucose levels at home.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yousaf et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: