Background PD-L1 is an indicator for immunotherapy however, the detection is based on biopsy and affected by tumor heterogeneity and patients’ intolerance. This study aimed to explore convenient alternatives for PD-L1 tissue detection. Methods With 134 cases recruitment, the peripheral lymphocyte subtypes and cytokines was detected by flow cytometry and PD-L1 expression in tumor microenvironment (TME) was detected by immunohistochemistry and assessed by two qualified pathologists. Results The patients with positive PD-L1 expression had peripheral CD8 + /CD28 + T lymphocytes 20% higher than those with negative expression ( p = 0.008) with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) being 0.66 ( p = 0.002). Among patients with positive PD-L1 expression and negative neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), peripheral CD8 + /CD28 + T lymphocytes were 54% higher than those with negative expression ( p = 0.003), with the AUC being 0.68 ( p = 0.003). In patients receiving NAT, peripheral TNF-α ( p = 0.010), increased from 0.45pg/ml to 0.64pg/ml in positive PD-L1 group, and the AUC was 0.79 ( p = 0.012). Among breast cancer patients with negative NAT experience, 1% increase of peripheral CD8 + /CD28 + T lymphocytes was associated with a 21% higher probability of positive PD-L1 expression (OR = 1.21, 95%CI = 1.06–1.37) and among patients with NAT, the OR of peripheral TNF-α > 0.5pg/ml was increased to 24.5 for positive TME PD-L1 expression (p = 0.008). Conclusion In breast cancer patients receiving NAT, peripheral TNF-α could be used to predict the TME PD-L1 expression, and in breast cancer patients without NAT, peripheral percentage of CD8 + /CD28 + T lymphocytes could be used to predict the TME PD-L1 expression. These biomarkers should be further implemented in practice to guide the immunotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: