Analysis reveals grassroots leadership challenges standard governance models, indicating its cultural significance.
This article develops the conceptual foundations of grassroots leadership as a counterpoint to professionalized and donor-driven models of non-profit governance. It integrates insights from Paulo Freire’s pedagogy of the oppressed, feminist leadership traditions, and Indigenous perspectives to reveal grassroots leadership as a culturally embedded and relational practice grounded in participation, trust, and collective responsibility. The analysis contrasts community-based legitimacy with institutional authority and examines variations between the Global South—where grassroots leadership often emerges as a survival strategy—and the Global North, where it serves as a form of advocacy and civic mobilization. By recognizing both its transformative potential and its limitations, including the risks of co-optation and internal inequality, the article argues that grassroots leadership is best understood as a dynamic, dialogical process that challenges dominant paradigms and advances the democratization of civil society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna Neya Kazanskaia (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: