Driving simulator study reveals that attitudes significantly influence risky behavior, highlighting potential for enhancing road safety.
Context and relevance. Road traffic accidents and violations of traffic regulations continue to be a frequent occurrence on highways, particularly among motor vehicle operators who demonstrate a tendency to disregard fundamental driving safety practices. Objective. The aim of this study is twofold: first, to explore the impact of the aforementioned factors on the subject's performance; second, to assess how driving safety attitudes influence driving risks through simulations. The hypothesis of this study is that a higher level of safety in driving behaviour will be associated with a lower frequency of risky driving behaviour in the simulation environment. Methods and materials. The study's participants comprised drivers who were in possession of a valid driving licence. In this study, researchers employed the City Car Driving 5 software and utilised a driving simulator, a driving risk scale, and a driving safety attitude scale. The subjects were divided into two groups. One group was subjected to a traffic density level and a pedestrian density level of 75%, which was designed to act as a form of disturbance. Following the utilisation of the driving simulator, subjects were required to complete a driving risk questionnaire and a driving safety attitude scale. The results obtained from this study are as follows. The findings of the study demonstrate a substantial relationship between driving safety attitudes and driving risks, with a value of 0,000 and a negative correlation value of -0,804. The study also indicates a 70,6% influence of driving safety attitudes on driving risks. Conclusions. The findings indicate that there remains a significant risk associated with driving, and there is no observed difference in risk between men and women, as both groups demonstrate equivalent levels of risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chrisnatalia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: