Observational data reveals increased wildfire risks in boreal forests, suggesting carbon emissions are rising.
Forests, once the largest terrestrial carbon sink, are increasingly becoming significant sources of carbon emissions worldwide due to large wildfires and the accumulation of fire fuels in warming environments that deplete soil and vegetation moisture. Despite growing needs such as Nature-Based Solutions, there is a lack of operationalized near-real-time (NRT) satellite observations of forest fuel conditions to assess whether forests are acting as carbon sinks or emitters. Most existing satellite products focus on chlorophyll content or vegetation cover rather than directly measuring hydrological or thermal variations that influence carbon flux. From Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) L-band microwave brightness temperature, we retrieved forest (or canopy) temperatures over the 2023 Canadian and 2021 Sakha Republic wildfires that generated some of the world’s largest carbon emissions. We propose forest canopy temperature as a predictor of natural carbon emissions from mega-wildfires, in comparison with Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Vegetation Water Content and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) land surface temperature products, which fail to capture the tipping points of thermal development in cold forests. The heat-amplifying feedback between warmed forests and pre-fire sensible heat indicates that forests’ capacity to absorb or radiate sensible heat accelerates snowmelt, fuel dryness, and wildfire spread. Under such conditions, forestation policies may inadvertently increase fuel loads and wildfire risk, potentially leading to an increase in net carbon emissions rather than achieving the intended benefits of carbon sequestration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: