PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 12, 2025Physical Review Research2 citationsOpen Access

Star Log-extended eMulation: A method for efficient computation of the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations

View Full Paper
SLSudhanva LalitASA. C. SemposkiJMJoshua M. Maldonado

Key Points

  • Star Log-extended eMulation (SLM) accurately emulates the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations for neutron stars, achieving significant computational speedup.
  • Using SLM, we replicate high-fidelity results for various equations of state, with an approximately 7.0 × 10⁴ speedup compared to traditional methods.
  • The method leverages the dynamic mode decomposition to efficiently handle the nonlinear dynamics of neutron star model equations.
  • SLM's ability to map between equations of state parameters and neutron star properties paves the way for advancements in uncertainty quantification.

Abstract

We emulate the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) equations, including tidal deformability, for neutron stars using a method based upon the Dynamic Mode Decomposition. This method, which we call Star Log-extended eMulation (SLM), utilizes the underlying logarithmic behavior of the differential equations to enable accurate emulation of the nonlinear system. We show predictions for well-known equations of state (EOSs) with fixed parameters using the SLM, accurately recreating high-fidelity results while achieving a computational speedup of ≈2.4×104. We test our parametric SLM method for a two-parameter quarkyonic EOS against high-fidelity RK4 TOV calculations and find a computational speedup of ≈7.0×104. Hence, SLM is an efficient emulator for the numerous TOV evaluations required by multimessenger astrophysical frameworks that infer constraints on the EOS. The ability of the SLM algorithm to learn a mapping between parameters of the EOS and subsequent neutron star properties also opens up potential extensions for assisting in computationally prohibitive uncertainty quantification for any type of EOS. The source code for the methods employed in this work is openly available in a public GitHub repository for community modification and use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lalit et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ebe3d6becc64ad52fdacffhttps://doi.org/10.1103/5p3h-b8rf
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–47152024 · 88 citations
  2. 2Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter2024 · 86 citations
  3. 3Non-Radial Pulsation of General-Relativistic Stellar Models. I. Analytic Analysis for L ≥ 21967 · 410 citations
  4. 4On Massive Neutron Cores1939 · 4,045 citations
  5. 5ERRATUM: “TIDAL LOVE NUMBERS OF NEUTRON STARS” (2008, ApJ, 677, 1216)2009 · 181 citations