Objectives: To compare surgical outcomes in patients with a known history of ocular herpes simplex virus (HSV) who received prophylactic antiviral treatment versus those who did not. Material and Methods: A prospective cohort study of 125 patients undergoing ocular surgery (cataract, corneal graft, or glaucoma surgery) with prior HSV ocular infection history. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 65) received antiviral prophylaxis (oral acyclovir), while Group B (n = 60) received no prophylaxis. Outcomes measured included HSV recurrence, graft rejection, inflammation, and visual acuity post-operatively over 12 months. An HSV diagnosis was made based on documented clinical history, signs of past HSV ocular disease, or past use of antivirals with a positive response. Results: HSV recurrence occurred in 4.6% of Group A versus 21.7% in Group B (p < 0.01). Significant inflammation occurred in 6.1% of Group A versus 23.3% of Group B (p < 0.01). Mean improvement in best-corrected visual acuity was better in Group A (+0.31 logMAR) versus Group B (+0.19 logMAR). Graft failure or surgical complications were higher in Group B. Conclusion: Prophylactic antiviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of HSV recurrence and improves surgical outcomes in patients with a prior ocular HSV history. In immunocompromised patients or cases of suspected acyclovir resistance, alternative antivirals such as valacyclovir or foscarnet may be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B Wade (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: