Exploration of Frege's abductivist logic indicates compatibility with analytic and a priori truths.
Frege is an abductivist about logic. For him, an acceptable logic must be sufficient—that is, it must be able to explain the relevant data, such as the fact that arithmetical laws are logical truths. Thus, Frege's logicism is an abductive project aimed at establishing the acceptability of his logic, Begriffsschrift. Though he regards logical truths as analytic and a priori, the way he defines analyticity and apriority is fully compatible with the abductive selection of a logic. Frege does admit logical intuition and takes it to play a role in logical investigation, such as in evidence‐gathering. However, given that other abductivists also partially recognize such traditional epistemologies for logic, we can legitimately consider Frege an abductivist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junyeol Kim (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: