Case reports highlight poor prognosis for advanced-stage peritoneal MLA in patients with endometriosis, suggesting clinical vigilance is necessary.
Reports of Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) arising from other than the ovary and uterus are exceedingly rare. This report details two cases of MLA in patients with a history of endometriosis. One of these two cases is believed to be the first documented case of primary peritoneal MLA. The first case was a 64-year-old woman with a history of hysterectomy and oophorectomy for endometriosis. She presented with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IVB primary peritoneal MLA, diagnosed eight years later via CT-guided biopsy and immunohistochemistry. Despite multiple chemotherapy regimens, she died 13 months after initiation of treatment. The second case was a 72-year-old woman with a history of endometriosis, and she was diagnosed with FIGO stage IIIA1(i) ovarian MLA. She underwent complete cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy and remained recurrence-free for three years. A literature review of 66 reported cases of ovarian MLA was conducted to compare clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis. According to these findings, 55% were diagnosed at an early stage (FIGO I-II), and prognosis was generally favorable after complete surgical resection, but outcomes were poor for sub-optimally resected cases. These cases suggest a potential link between MLA development and a history of endometriosis, particularly after surgical intervention. The prognosis for MLA is highly dependent on achieving complete surgical resection. Advanced-stage primary peritoneal MLA has a poor prognosis, comparable to conventional primary peritoneal serous carcinoma. Given the difficulty of preoperative diagnosis, diligent follow-up is recommended for high-risk patients with a history of endometriosis. Future research is needed to establish effective treatments for advanced or recurrent disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sano et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: