Descriptive qualitative analysis reveals whistleblowing and Islamic ethics significantly reduce fraud in organizations, suggesting legal protection for whistleblowers is essential.
General Background: Fraud poses a significant threat to companies, causing financial losses and reputational damage, with preventive measures being more effective than repressive actions. Specific Background: In organizational contexts, the integration of whistleblowing mechanisms and Islamic ethics offers a framework for mitigating fraudulent behavior, yet empirical studies examining their combined role remain limited. Knowledge Gap: Existing research often addresses whistleblowing or ethical principles separately, lacking comprehensive insights into their joint contribution to fraud prevention within regional public companies. Aims: This study investigates the role of whistleblowing and Islamic ethics in preventing fraud among employees of Delta Tirta Sidoarjo Regional Public Company (PERUMDA). Methods: A descriptive qualitative approach was applied, utilizing interviews, observations, and documentation, with data validity ensured through triangulation. Results: Findings indicate that whistleblowing and Islamic ethics effectively prevent fraud by aligning with the Guidelines for Reporting Violations set by the National Committee on Governance Policy. Novelty: The study highlights the combined role of ethical and procedural mechanisms in fraud prevention, emphasizing the need for strengthened legal protection of whistleblowers. Implications: This research provides practical guidance for organizations seeking sustainable strategies to minimize fraud and enhance ethical compliance. Highlights: Combines ethical values and procedural mechanisms to prevent fraud. Highlights legal protection as critical for sustainable whistleblowing. Provides practical guidance for corporate fraud mitigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Via et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: