The article demonstrates how a dialectical approach clarifies mathematical creativity in set theory and geometry, implying new insights.
The article sets the task to show how the dialectical form of thinking is concretized in the form of a new dialectical approach to mathematical creativity. Its philosophical basis is the fundamental ontology of Martin Heidegger, from which the operation of dialectical negation, called privation, is borrowed. Privation in its ultimate expression finds a place in the paraconsistent (“Imaginary”) logic of N.A. Vasiliev, operating with logical antinomies and revealing their difference from logical contradictions (from logical absurdity). In logical and mathematical research, a clear example of the application of privation are the well-known Gödel incompleteness theorems, which establish the existence of positive integers with properties opposite to the properties of inductive numbers (N.N. Luzin). Within the framework of the task, the descriptive set theory of Luzin and the non-Euclidean (hyperbolic) geometry of Lobachevsky are analyzed. They are united by the problem of ordering the arithmetic continuum. In this context, the question is posed as to why the set of real points of the continuum is not countably ordered, and an answer is given. The answer is provided by the dialectical approach to mathematical creativity described here as part of the logical discipline of thinking called complementary-dialectical logic. The dialectical approach to mathematical creativity includes the transformation of mathematical logic developed on the basis of classical formal logic. This transformation is presented in the article as a synthesis of the extensional and intensional aspects of logical thinking, which are often called (for brevity) extensional and intensional logic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leonid Antipenko (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: