Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 15, 2025Engineering headway

Capabilities of UAV Photo Technology for Detailed Mapping of Pipelines

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

QHQ. Iwan HimawanLFListiyo FitriNWNurrohmat Widjajanti

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis shows UAV photos for pipeline mapping fall behind UAV LiDAR and GNSS surveys in technical ability and cost-effectiveness.

Key Points

  • The UAV photo method scored only 12.5 in mapping pipelines, indicating limited technical capability.
  • UAV LiDAR achieved the highest score of 21.2 in pipeline mapping, outperforming both UAV photos and GNSS surveys.
  • This analysis focused on two parameters: technical ability scoring 70% and cost-effectiveness scoring 30%.
  • Height detection of pipelines and supports is critical, revealing the UAV photo method's shortcomings in topographic mapping.

Cite This Study

Himawan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68efd921056559ef428773achttps://doi.org/10.4028/p-efkjo3
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used2018 · 415 citations
  2. 2Photogrammetry Using UAV-Mounted GNSS RTK: Georeferencing Strategies without GCPs2021 · 147 citations
  3. 3Enhancing UAV-SfM Photogrammetry for Terrain Modeling from the Perspective of Spatial Structure of Errors2023 · 17 citations
  4. 4Influence of AGL flight and off-nadir images on UAV-SfM accuracy in complex morphology terrains2022 · 6 citations