Understanding variation in the clinical management of self-harm and suicidal ideation in hospital emergency departments: qualitative implementation study

Aims and method There is growing consensus on essential components of care for hospital-presenting self-harm and suicidal ideation, yet these are often inconsistently implemented. This qualitative study aimed to explore the implementation of components of care across hospitals. Interviews were conducted with health professionals providing care for self-harm and suicidal ideation in hospital emergency departments. Participants ( N = 30) represented 15 hospitals and various professional roles. A framework analysis was used, where factors affecting each care component were mapped by hospital and hospital grouping. Results A timely, compassionate response was facilitated by collaboration between liaison psychiatry and emergency-department staff and the availability of designated space. Other factors affecting the implementation of care components included patient preferences for, and staff encouragement of, family involvement, time taken to complete written care plans and handover and availability of next care impacting follow-up of patients. Clinical implications The findings suggest a need for further integration of all clinical professionals on the liaison psychiatry team in implementing care for self-harm; improved systems of handover; further training and awareness on the benefits and optimal processes of family involvement; as well as enhanced access to aftercare.