Quasi-experimental design improved higher order thinking skills in students with OLabs, indicating potential for hybrid models.
This study was motivated by the low levels of student engagement and higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) observed in a preliminary investigation at State High School 1 Talaga, exacerbated by limited laboratory resources that hindered effective learning. The research aimed to explore the effect of a Problem-Based Hybrid Learning (Pro-BHL) model, supported by OLabs (Online Laboratory), on improving students' HOTS, specifically in the topics of heat and heat transfer. A quasi-experimental design with a posttest-only control group was implemented, involving 244 students from 7 classes. Through purposive sampling, the study selected class XI MIPA 3 as the experimental group and XI MIPA 2 as the control group. HOTS was measured via an essay-based posttest, addressing analysis (C4), evaluation (C5), and creation (C6) indicators. The results, analyzed using a t-test at a significance level of α = 0.05, revealed a statistically significant improvement in the experimental group’s HOTS (tcount = 6.65 > ttable = 1.67), rejecting the null hypothesis and confirming the effectiveness of the Pro-BHL model supported by OLabs. The findings indicate that this hybrid learning model significantly enhanced students' higher-order thinking skills in the studied topics. The research highlights the potential of integrating technology like OLabs into problem-based learning frameworks, providing a scalable solution to overcome practical limitations in science education. Future research could explore integrating other virtual laboratory platforms and extending the model to different learning environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: