Quasi-experimental study shows the problem-posing learning model boosts engagement and higher-order thinking skills in tenth graders, indicating effective pedagogical strategies.
Student engagement and Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) are critical in Islamic education, particularly within traditional settings such as Ma’had Al-Buus Al-Islamiah, Southern Thailand. This study investigates the impact of the problem-posing learning model in enhancing these two dimensions. This quasi-experimental study employed a pretest-posttest control group design involving 80 tenth-grade students. Participants were divided into an experimental group (n = 40), which received instruction using the problem-posing model, and a control group (n = 40), which followed conventional teaching methods. Data were collected through classroom observations, validated HOTS tests, and engagement questionnaires. The findings reveal that the problem-posing model significantly improved both student engagement and HOTS. Engagement levels reached 91.6% in the experimental group compared to 67.8% in the control group. HOTS, measured through N-Gain scores, increased to 91.93% in the experimental group versus 84.90% in the control group. Statistical analyses confirmed the significance of these differences (p 0.05), with large effect sizes. The results suggest that the problem-posing model promotes active learning, critical thinking, and problem-solving, even within culturally traditional Islamic education environments. It aligns with constructivist and dialogical learning theories by fostering student-centered inquiry and deeper cognitive engagement. Implementing the problem-posing learning model in Islamic education settings can effectively enhance both engagement and higher-order thinking. These findings support the adoption of innovative pedagogies to improve student outcomes in religious and general educational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: