October 16, 2025Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi dan Kajian HukumOpen Access

Normative Analysis Of Defamation Provisions In The Information And Electronic Transactions Law In The Perspective Of Legal Certainty

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Article 27A of the EIT Law poses risks to freedom of expression, potentially criminalizing legitimate criticism.
Research shows legal certainty is compromised due to ambiguous language in Article 27A, particularly concerning 'another person.'
Normative juridical analysis highlights the conflict between current defamation provisions and human rights principles.
There is an urgent need for revision of Article 27A to align with legal principles and democratic values.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Normative analysis reveals weaknesses in Article 27A of the EIT Law regarding defamation, suggesting that revisions are essential for safeguarding freedom of expression.

Cite This Study

Devi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f04935e559138a1a06e4be https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6305

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Normative analysis reveals weaknesses in Article 27A of the EIT Law regarding defamation, suggesting that revisions are essential for safeguarding freedom of expression.

Normative Analysis Of Defamation Provisions In The Information And Electronic Transactions Law In The Perspective Of Legal Certainty

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Normative Analysis Of Defamation Provisions In The Information And Electronic Transactions Law In The Perspective Of Legal Certainty

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider