Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 16, 2025Scientific ReportsOpen Access

Relative comparison of goodness factor for various channel shapes for counter flow microchannel heat exchanger

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

VPVishwas Kumar PandeyVNVinay Pratap Singh NegiCRC. Ranganayakulu

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Numerical analysis identifies novel channel shapes to enhance heat transfer and goodness factor in microchannel heat exchangers.

Key Points

  • The study determined that optimized microchannel shapes improved heat transfer efficiency significantly.
  • Three-dimensional numerical analysis validated with experimental data showed variations of 3–5% for hot fluid comparisons.
  • Novel channel configurations achieved a 20-30% increase in goodness factor compared to baseline designs under similar conditions.
  • The perforated and non-perforated straight channels with step heights demonstrated superior heat transfer performance.

Cite This Study

Pandey et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f10ecee6a12fd0428997behttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19763-4
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Empirical Correlations for Heat Transfer and Flow Friction Characteristics of Rectangular Offset-Fin Plate-Fin Heat Exchangers1975 · 253 citations
  2. 2Flow boiling in microchannels: Fundamentals and applications2016 · 585 citations