Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study assesses readability of fecal microbiota transplantation resources, highlighting poor patient comprehension.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is increasingly used in geriatric medicine, including intestinal decolonization of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial pathogens and the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, graft versus host disease and autism spectrum disorders. The aim of this study was to examine readability of patient-facing FMT information. Readability was calculated using Readable software, examining (i) Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), (ii) Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), (iii) Gunning Fog Index and (iv) SMOG Index and two text metrics [words/sentence, syllables/word] for 234 sources of FMT information, from four categories (abstracts/hospital information/patient-facing information/clinical trials). Mean readability scores of FMT information for FRE and FKGL were 22.2 ± 1.2 (SEM)) (target > 60) and 14.8 ± 0.2 (target < 8), respectively, with mean words/sentence and syllables/word of 19.2 ± 0.4 and 2.0, respectively. There was no significant difference in readability between scientific abstracts and lay summaries. No information was found that had a readability of less than 7th grade (12-13 year olds). Readability of FMT information for patients is poor, not reaching readability reference standards. Authors of FMT information should consider using readability calculators when preparing FMT information, so that the final material is within recommended readability reference parameters, to support the health literacy and treatment adherence of readers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: