Cross-sectional study measured patient satisfaction, highlighting accessibility and affordability in diagnostics.
Background & Objectives: Patient satisfaction is a multidimensional concept that consists of client'sperceived needs, their expectations and experience of a health care system. This study aimed to assess patientsatisfaction with pathology and radiology services at a public tertiary care hospital in a Pakistanimetropolitan city.Methods: From August to December 2023, we conducted exit interviews with 434 randomly selected adultpatients at a 1700-bed teaching hospital in Lahore. Using the SERVQUAL® questionnaire, we assessedclient satisfaction and service quality across accessibility, affordability, reliability, responsiveness, andassurance.Analysisinvolved descriptive statistics, patientsatisfaction scoring, and examining socio-demographicfactors with multiple logistic regression.Results: Out of 248 pathology clients, 74 (29.8%) were aged 35-44 years and 127 (51.2%) were female. Of186 radiology clients, 63 (33.8%) were aged 45 or older and 137 (73.7%) were male. Overall, 59% clientsusing pathology and 53% clients using radiology services were satisfied with more females (75%;p=<0.001)were satisfied from radiology service. Only one-third of clients were satisfied with problem resolution andthe availability of a helpline. Higher likelihood of satisfaction from radiology services was found foraffordability (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.12-2.87, p=0.001) and accessibility (OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.05-2.13,p=0.01) service domains, whereas for pathology service, accessibility and level of education were significantdomains of satisfaction.Conclusions: Asignificant proportion of clients at a teaching hospital in a developing country were dissatisfiedwith pathology and radiology services. Key predictors of satisfaction included education level, area ofresidence, responsiveness, accessibility, and affordability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bokhari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: