Experimental analysis demonstrates improved sweep efficiency and reservoir management using co2 foam flooding systems.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) has been widely applied in gas flooding for reservoir development due to its remarkable oil recovery potential. However, because its viscosity is lower than that of water and most crude oils, severe channeling often occurs during the flooding process, resulting in a significant reduction in the sweep efficiency. To address this issue, foam flooding has attracted considerable attention as an effective method for controlling CO2 mobility. In this study, a compound foam system was developed with alpha-olefin sulfonate (AOS) as the primary foaming agent, alcohol ethoxylate (AEO) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as co-surfactants, and partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) as the stabilizer. The optimal system was screened through evaluations of comprehensive foam index, salt tolerance, oil resistance, and shear resistance. Results indicate that the AOS+AEO formulation exhibits superior foaming ability, salt tolerance, and foam stability compared with the AOS+CTAB system, with the best performance achieved at a mass ratio of 2:1 (AOS:AEO), balancing both adaptability and economic feasibility. A heterogeneous reservoir model was constructed using parallel core flooding to investigate the displacement performance and blocking capability of the system. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging was employed to monitor in situ oil phase migration and clarify the recovery mechanisms. Experimental results show that the compound foam system demonstrates excellent conformance control performance, achieving a blocking efficiency of 84.5% and improving the overall oil recovery by 4.6%. NMR imaging further reveals that the system effectively mobilizes low-permeability zones, with T2 spectrum analysis indicating a 4.5% incremental recovery in low-permeability layers. Moreover, in reservoirs with larger permeability ratio, the system exhibits enhanced blocking efficiency (up to 86.5%), though the incremental recovery is not strictly proportional to the blocking effect. Compared with previous AOS-based CO2 foam studies that primarily relied on pressure drop and effluent analyses, this work introduces NMR imaging and T2 spectrum diagnostics to directly visualize pore-scale fluid redistribution and quantify sweep efficiency within heterogeneous cores. The NMR data provide mechanistic evidence that the enhanced recovery originates from selective foam propagation and the mobilization of residual oil in low-permeability channels, rather than merely from increased flow resistance. This integration of advanced pore-scale imaging with macroscopic displacement analysis represents a mechanistic advancement over conventional CO2 foam evaluations, offering new insights into the conformance control behavior of AOS-based foam systems in heterogeneous reservoirs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: