This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Conventional CO 2 flooding provides limited oil recovery because of early CO 2 breakthrough and poor sweep efficiency in heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs. In contrast, CO 2 foam flooding, generated in-situ using surfactants, offers improved mobility control, increased oil displacement, and additional CO 2 storage benefits. This review evaluates recent advances in CO 2 foam-enhanced oil recovery based on experiments, simulations, and field-scale applications, with particular emphasis on nanoparticle-stabilized foams because of their improved stability and sweep efficiency. Furthermore, the review presents key site-selection criteria and examines technical challenges, including injectivity and foam propagation. It also discusses pore-scale displacement mechanisms, economic considerations, CO 2 storage potential, and current knowledge gaps to guide future research and support commercial deployment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mwakipunda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: