Analysis reveals that government incentives and cost factors influence construction enterprises' strategy choices.
The decision-making regarding the development of intelligent construction in construction enterprises is crucial for the transformation and upgrading of the construction industry. This paper constructs an evolutionary game model among construction enterprises and applies system dynamics for simulation analysis of the game model. It explores the impact of key factors on the strategy choices of the game participants. The research findings indicate that the initial state of construction enterprises’ willingness to transition to intelligent construction in the evolutionary game model influences the final stable strategy. Direct benefits, the strength of government incentives, penalty intensity, and reduced costs through joint transition positively affect the probability of construction enterprises implementing intelligent construction, while incremental transition costs and positive spillover effect are negatively correlated. When the direct benefit rate exceeds 5%, costs are jointly reduced by more than 2%, and transition costs are below 35 CNY/m2, it can significantly motivate enterprises to adopt intelligent construction. A certain level of government incentives (at least greater than 5 CNY/m2) has a positive effect on the transformation process; however, once the incentives exceed 10 CNY/m2, their impact stabilizes. Penalties only affect the speed at which the system evolves toward a stable point. Current policy incentives do not require further enhancement. Meanwhile, reducing incremental transition costs is more effective than increasing the intensity of government incentives. The research conclusions contribute to the quantitative analysis of how changes in different key factors affect the dynamic evolution of strategy adjustments by construction enterprises over time, thereby providing corresponding recommendations for transformation and upgrading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: