This research finds a novel subtraction method to improve axial and pseudoscalar form factors in nucleons, indicating enhanced precision in lattice QCD calculations.
We perform a precise calculation of physical quantities related to the axial structure of the nucleon using <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:mn>2</a:mn><a:mo>+</a:mo><a:mn>1</a:mn></a:mrow></a:math> flavor lattice QCD gauge configuration (PACS10 configuration) generated at the physical point with lattice volume larger than <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mrow><c:mo stretchy="false">(</c:mo><c:mn>10</c:mn><c:mtext> </c:mtext><c:mtext> </c:mtext><c:mi>fm</c:mi><c:msup><c:mrow><c:mo stretchy="false">)</c:mo></c:mrow><c:mrow><c:mn>4</c:mn></c:mrow></c:msup></c:mrow></c:math> by the PACS Collaboration. The nucleon matrix element of the axial-vector current has two types of the nucleon form factors, the axial-vector (<g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:msub><g:mi>F</g:mi><g:mi>A</g:mi></g:msub></g:math>) form factor and the induced pseudoscalar (<i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:msub><i:mi>F</i:mi><i:mi>P</i:mi></i:msub></i:math>) form factor. Recently, lattice QCD simulations have succeeded in reproducing the experimental value of the axial-vector coupling, <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:msub><k:mi>g</k:mi><k:mi>A</k:mi></k:msub></k:math>, determined from <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msub><m:mi>F</m:mi><m:mi>A</m:mi></m:msub><m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo><m:msup><m:mi>q</m:mi><m:mn>2</m:mn></m:msup><m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo></m:math> at zero momentum transfer <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:msup><q:mi>q</q:mi><q:mn>2</q:mn></q:msup><q:mo>=</q:mo><q:mn>0</q:mn></q:math>, at a percent level of statistical accuracy. However, the <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:msub><s:mi>F</s:mi><s:mi>P</s:mi></s:msub></s:math> form factor so far has not reproduced the experimental values well due to strong <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mi>π</u:mi><u:mi>N</u:mi></u:math> excited-state contamination. Therefore, we propose a simple subtraction method for removing the so-called leading <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><w:mi>π</w:mi><w:mi>N</w:mi></w:math>-state contribution. This method succeeds in reproducing the values obtained by two experiments of muon capture on the proton and pion electroproduction for <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:msub><y:mi>F</y:mi><y:mi>P</y:mi></y:msub><y:mo stretchy="false">(</y:mo><y:msup><y:mi>q</y:mi><y:mn>2</y:mn></y:msup><y:mo stretchy="false">)</y:mo></y:math>. The novel approach can also be applied to determine the pseudoscalar (<cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:msub><cb:mi>G</cb:mi><cb:mi>P</cb:mi></cb:msub></cb:math>) form factor from the nucleon pseudoscalar matrix element with the help of the axial Ward-Takahashi identity. The resulting form factors, <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><eb:msub><eb:mi>F</eb:mi><eb:mi>P</eb:mi></eb:msub><eb:mo stretchy="false">(</eb:mo><eb:msup><eb:mi>q</eb:mi><eb:mn>2</eb:mn></eb:msup><eb:mo stretchy="false">)</eb:mo></eb:math> and <ib:math xmlns:ib="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ib:msub><ib:mi>G</ib:mi><ib:mi>P</ib:mi></ib:msub><ib:mo stretchy="false">(</ib:mo><ib:msup><ib:mi>q</ib:mi><ib:mn>2</ib:mn></ib:msup><ib:mo stretchy="false">)</ib:mo></ib:math>, are in good agreement with the prediction of the pion-pole dominance model. In the new analysis, the induced pseudoscalar coupling <mb:math xmlns:mb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mb:msubsup><mb:mi>g</mb:mi><mb:mi>P</mb:mi><mb:mo>*</mb:mo></mb:msubsup></mb:math> and the pion-nucleon coupling <ob:math xmlns:ob="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ob:msub><ob:mi>g</ob:mi><ob:mrow><ob:mi>π</ob:mi><ob:mi>N</ob:mi><ob:mi>N</ob:mi></ob:mrow></ob:msub></ob:math> can be evaluated with a few percent accuracy including systematic uncertainties using existing data calculated at two lattice spacings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aoki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: