Observational analysis assesses the role of faint galaxies in cosmic reionization, highlighting their potential as key contributors.
Investigating how small-scale physical processes shape large-scale astrophysical phenomena is one of the key science themes of the Astro2020 decadal Survey. An example of this interplay is Cosmic Reionization, where ionizing photons from galaxies escaped into the intergalactic medium (IGM), driving its transition from neutral to ionized at $z>6$. Star-forming galaxies are thought to be the dominant sources of reionization. However, an open question remains as to whether bright or faint star-forming galaxies are the primary reionization contributors. This depends on the escape fraction f~escLyC -- the fraction of ionizing photons that successfully escape the galaxy's interstellar and circumgalactic medium to reach the IGM. Performing direct measurements of f~escLyC during the reionization epoch is not feasible, due to the near-zero transmission of the IGM at z4. However, by calibrating f~escLyC against indirect indicators (i.e. galaxy properties that correlate with f~escLyC) at lower z, we can estimate its value in galaxies during reionization. Currently, f~escLyC calibrations are mostly limited to ~ 90 sources brighter MUV ~ -18 at z~0.3. Yet, recent models suggest that fainter galaxies (-19<MUV<-13) may be the major contributors to reionization. Our science goal is to extend f~escLyC calibrations to such faint magnitudes. With the Habitable Worlds Observatory, we aim to achieve a ~ 20-fold increase in statistical power. Additionally, we plan to reach magnitudes as faint as 1/100 L^* at z~0.1. Suitable targets will be selected from the upcoming Ultraviolet Explorer (UVEX) survey. Through this science case, we will be able to place robust constraints on the role of faint galaxies in the reionization of the Universe and identify its primary contributors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Citro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: