Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis demonstrates LPG's 8.35% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions in vehicles, highlighting energy efficiency and climate benefit.
This study investigates the energy and environmental implications of replacing E10 gasoline with Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in a Euro 4 passenger car under real-world urban driving conditions. A comparative methodology robust to operating-state distribution was applied, combining portable exhaust gas analysis with on-board diagnostic data to calculate energy-specific emissions per crankshaft revolution and to reconstruct emission surfaces in the load–RPM domain using bilinear interpolation. The study revealed that LPG reduces carbon dioxide emissions by 8.35%, demonstrating a clear climate and energy benefit due to its lower carbon intensity. In comparison, carbon monoxide (+9.5%) and hydrocarbons (+8.3%) increased under low-load and idle conditions. Nitrogen oxides showed only minor differences between the fuels (+1.3%). LPG exhibited a more stable CO2 emission profile, reflecting improved combustion efficiency from an energy perspective, although its performance in terms of incomplete combustion products requires further optimisation. The methodology highlights how linking energy efficiency with pollutant formation provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating alternative fuels in Real Driving Emissions (RDE) tests. The results confirm LPG’s potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in transport systems and identify calibration strategies needed to mitigate trade-offs in local pollutant emissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kozłowski et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: