Evaluation framework shows art intervention boosts community resilience in urban villages, suggesting practical strategies.
Art intervention has emerged as an innovative pathway for community regeneration, significantly enhancing physical and socio-economic conditions, yet its specific impacts on community resilience remain underexplored. This study proposes an evaluation framework that integrates the BRIC community resilience model with key dimensions of art intervention. Taking three typical art villages in suburban Beijing (Feijia, Xiaopu, and Xinzhuang) as cases, 452 questionnaires were conducted. The coupling and coordination model was used to analyze interactions between subsystems, and the obstacle factor model was employed to identify barriers to their synergistic development. The results show that: (1) There is a significant positive correlation between the degree of art intervention and community resilience. (2) The coupling and coordination degree exhibits distinct stage differentiation, with art intervention directly affecting its level. Xiaopu Village has the highest coupling and coordination degree (0.8004), followed by Xinzhuang Village (0.6914) and Feijia Village (0.6400). (3) Key obstacles include participation in art activities (9.2%), influence of interactions (9.0%), cultural literacy (8.5%), use of art spaces (7.2%), and industrial influence (6.3%). This study establishes a novel theoretical framework for the synergy between art intervention and community resilience, offering practical strategies for sustainable urban village revitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: