Modified linear active disturbance rejection control enhances anti-disturbance capability in UAVs, improving tracking under high-frequency disturbances.
With the rapid development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology, quadrotor UAVs have demonstrated extensive application potential in various fields. However, due to parameter uncertainties and strong coupling, the flight attitude of quadrotors is prone to external disturbances, posing challenges for achieving precise control and stable flight. In this paper, we address the tracking control problem under unknown command rate variations by proposing a Modified Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control (LADRC) strategy, aiming to enhance flight stability and anti-disturbance capability in complex environments. First, based on the attitude dynamics model of quadrotors, an LADRC technique is adopted to realize three-channel decoupling-free control. By integrating a parameter estimator, the proposed method can compensate unknown disturbances in real time, thereby improving the system’s anti-disturbance ability and dynamic response performance. Second, to further enhance system robustness, a linear extended state observer (LESO) is designed to accurately estimate the tracking error rate and total disturbances. Additionally, a Levant differentiator is introduced to replace the traditional differentiation component for optimizing the response speed of command rate. Finally, a modified LADRC controller incorporating error rate estimation is constructed. Simulation results validate that the proposed scheme maintains good tracking accuracy under high-frequency disturbances, providing an effective solution for stable UAV flight in complex scenarios. Compared with traditional control methods, the modified LADRC strategy exhibits significant advantages in tracking performance, anti-disturbance capability, and dynamic response. This research not only offers a novel perspective and solution for quadrotor control problems but also holds important implications for improving UAV performance and reliability in practical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: