Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals critical barriers to robot adoption in construction, highlighting socio-cultural and economic factors.
The adoption of robots in the construction phase can improve safety by replacing hazardous tasks and enhance productivity by automating repetitive work. Despite these advantages, adoption remains slow, constrained by economic, industrial, institutional, socio-cultural, and technological barriers. Wider acceptance is particularly urgent in construction, where fragmented processes, low profit margins, and safety risks make innovation both necessary and challenging. This study identified 22 critical barriers through a systematic literature review and categorized them into five dimensions. Beyond identification, the study prioritized these barriers using ISM and MICMAC analysis, clarifying which factors are fundamental drivers and which are outcome-related. The results showed that economic drivers occupy the base of the hierarchy and exert the greatest systemic influence, socio-cultural barriers emerge as highly dependent outcomes, and software usability acts as a linkage factor connecting technological immaturity with social acceptance. These findings reveal that barriers are interdependent rather than isolated and underscore the need for a structured prioritization framework. By applying ISM and MICMAC, this study presents a stepwise roadmap that differentiates fundamental drivers from outcome-related constraints, offering academic insights and practical guidance for policymakers to design strategies such as investment incentives, standardization, legal frameworks, and R&D expansion to accelerate adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: