Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals the periphery's agency in shaping EHEA construction and global higher education dynamics, highlighting critical insights.
Discussions on the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) often highlight its global influence. However, the role of non-EHEA countries—the "periphery"—in shaping its development remains underexplored. This article examines how the "periphery" has contributed to the EHEA's evolution. Drawing on world-system and decolonial theories and using critical discourse analysis of 26 EHEA documents (1998–2024), we argue that the "periphery" is not merely a passive recipient of EHEA policies but has played a key role in its construction. This argument is explored through three themes: (1) constitutive influence of the periphery on the EHEA's external dimension; (2) historical and structural role of the periphery in the EHEA's global status; and (3) the "periphery" as a consultative body shaping EHEA policy dialogue. Recognizing these roles challenges Eurocentric narratives and underscores the "periphery's" agency in co-constructing global higher education. These insights are crucial for informing international policy discussions and reform efforts within EHEA signatory states and beyond. By shifting the focus from EHEA's dominance to a more collaborative and nuanced relationship between the core and the periphery, this analysis offers a revised understanding of how global higher education is shaped beyond traditional core–periphery binaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eta et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: