Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis shows tenecteplase improves mRS score and reduces early neurological deterioration in patients with DWI-negative ischemic stroke, suggesting enhanced safety.
Introduction Clear evidence supporting thrombolytic therapy in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-negative posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCIS) is lacking. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis using tenecteplase (TNK) for the treatment of DWI-negative PCIS. Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on 310 patients with DWI-negative PCIS (TNK group, 100 patients; control group, 210 patients) with propensity score matching (PSM, 63 pairs). Efficacy was assessed using the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and early neurological deterioration (END); safety was evaluated by mortality and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Results The PSM-matched cohort comprised 126 patients (67 men), with a mean age of 68.9 ± 7.9 years. After PSM matching, the 24 h National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of the two patient groups [3.0 (3.0, 5.0) vs. 4.0 (3.0, 6.0) points] and the NIHSS scores at discharge [2.0 (1.0, 3.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) points] ( p < 0.05) were compared. In the PSM-matched TNK group, the 90-day 0–1 mRS score (85.7% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.028) and END rate (1.6% vs. 19.0%, p = 0.011) were significantly better than those of the control group with no increased mortality or sICH. However, the control group had a 90-day mortality rate of 3.2% (2/63; both patients died of stroke-induced pulmonary infections). Conclusion In patients with DWI-negative PCIS, TNK increased the proportion of patients achieving a mRS score of 0–1, reduced the incidence of END, improved long-term prognosis, and demonstrated a favorable safety profile; in contrast, the control group exhibited a higher incidence of END and poorer overall prognosis. Notably, this study has limitations, including its single-center retrospective design and small sample size after PSM, which may restrict the generalizability of the present findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: