Randomized controlled trial shows esketamine lowers hypotension and hypoxia incidence in patients receiving sedation, indicating improved safety profile.
Most troubling of painless gastrointestinal endoscopy is hypoxia and hypotension. Esketamine has sympathomimetic and respiratory protection, which combined with midazolam and propofol may reduce these troubles. So, this study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of this regimen. In total, 318 patients who received painless gastrointestinal endoscopy from November 2022 to April 2023 were included and randomly divided into two groups at 1:1: 0.1 µg/kg sufentanil (Suf) or 0.15 mg/kg esketamine (Esk) group. Except for analgesics, all patients were given midazolam and propofol. The incidence of hypotension and hypoxia (SPO2 < 93%) during the examination was observed. Compared with the Suf, the Esk group reduced the incidence of hypotension (12.8% vs 36.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.20—33.09, P < 0.001), respiratory depression (apnea > 30 s) (2.1% vs 15.4%, 6.47—20.52, P < 0.001), and hypoxia (7.1% vs 16.1%, 1.07—16.92, P = 0.018), but may increase the incidence of coughing (P < 0.001) and increased secretions (P = 0.032). There was no significant difference in the examination and recovery time (P > 0.05). Esketamine, midazolam, and propofol for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy can achieve opioid-free sedation and reduce the occurrence of hypotension and hypoxia. However, the dosages of this regimen need to be further explored to avoid coughing and increased secretions. This study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Center ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html , Date: November 3, 2022, No: ChiCTR2200065379). Esketamine, midazolam and propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy can achieve opioid-free sedation. Esketamine (vs. Sufentanil) for gastrointestinal endoscopy can reduce the incidence of hypotension and hypoxia. Esketamine (vs. Sufentanil) for gastrointestinal endoscopy may increase the incidence of coughing and increased secretions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: