Randomized double-blind trial reports a strategy targeting hypoxemia in obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing gastroscopy, highlighting potential improvements in sedation safety.
Background Propofol sedation in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) frequently induces hypoxemia, posing significant clinical risks. Esketamine, an N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, may reduce propofol requirements while preserving respiratory stability, but its efficacy in OSA patients remains unproven. At the studied dose (0.25 mg/kg), esketamine’s potential side effects (transient hypertension) are expected to be mild and self-limited. Therefore, we aimed to test whether low-dose esketamine (0.25 mg/kg) can reduce the incidence of hypoxemia in moderate-to-high risk OSA patients during propofol-based painless gastroscopy. Methods This single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled superiority trial will enroll 294 patients (STOP-Bang score ≥ 3, 18–90 years, STOP-Bang = Snoring, Tiredness, Observed apnea, Pressure [blood], Body Mass Index [BMI], Age, Neck size, Gender.) undergoing gastroscopy. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either esketamine (0.25 mg/kg) plus propofol or saline placebo plus propofol, stratified by age (18–65 vs. > 65 years) and OSA severity (STOP-Bang 5–6 vs. ≥ 7). The primary outcome is the incidence of hypoxemia (Peripheral Oxygen Saturation [SpO 2 ] < 90% for > 10 s). Secondary outcomes include severe hypoxemia (SpO 2 ≤ 75% or ≤ 90% for ≥ 60 s), duration of hypoxemia, emergency airway management, propofol consumption, hemodynamic stability, involuntary body movements, procedure/recovery times, and clinician satisfaction (measured via 10-cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]). Discussion This protocol rigorously evaluates esketamine’s potential to improve sedation safety in OSA patients, addressing a critical gap in peri-procedural care. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500099420). Registered on March 24, 2025 (Supplementary File 2). Si-Qi Hao is a co-first author with the same contribution as the first author. The corresponding author is Li-Xin An.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: