This analysis demonstrates how thorium-uranium fuel improves burnup and prompt neutron lifetime in MASLWR cores, indicating enhanced reactor performance.
In this work, a neutronic analysis estimation of a Multi-Application Small Light Water Reactor (MASLWR) core with the minimum possible modifications in the geometry will be presented. In this study, many cases are investigated, in the first case the reactor core is fuelled by uranium with enrichment 4.95 %. For the second case the reactor core is fuelled by uranium with enrichment 4.95 % and a mixture of 50 % uranium and 50 % thorium. For this case, five different core distributions are modeled. For the third case, a seed and blanket design is investigated where the middle positions of each assembly are fuelled with 4.95 % enriched UO 2 while the boundary positions are fuelled once with 50 % ThO 2 + 4.95 % enriched UO 2 and second with 30 % ThO 2 + 4.95 % enriched UO 2 . MCNP6 code has been used to calculate neutronic parameters such as effective multiplication coefficient ( K eff ), cycle length for reactor core, the nuclear fuel evolution during the burnup, total neutron flux, kinetic parameters such as delayed neutrons fraction and prompt neutron lifetime and finally, the power peaking factor of the MASLWR different cores. The results show that the utilization of thorium fuel improves the overall performance characteristics of the MASLWR without burnable poisons. The results are compared with the uranium core enrichment 4.95 %. All thorium cases have better conversion and longer reactor cycle and higher fuel burn-up, and the most attractive feature is its resistance to nuclear proliferation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ateya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: